Companies issue debt securities to related parties for numerous reasons. It is critical that such debt is respected as debt by tax authorities. One key factor in assessing if an intercompany debt should be characterized as debt for tax purposes is whether or not the terms of the debt are “commercially reasonable”, defined as being substantially similar to the terms to which an unrelated third party bargaining at arm’s length would reasonably be expected to agree.
Kroll’s advice can cover the amount of the proposed leverage in the capital structure, the interest rate on the debt, and the other economic terms of the debt security. In addition, Kroll is often requested to provide a financial opinion regarding the commercial reasonableness of the economic terms of the debt and the leverage in the company’s capital structure.
The following are typical transactions for which Kroll has been engaged to provide advice and opinions with respect to intercompany debt:
For nearly 15 years, company management, boards of directors, trustees of income funds as well as tax attorneys and tax advisors have relied on Kroll’s advice and opinions to support their view that an intercompany debt security should be characterized as debt for tax purposes.
#1 ranked provider of fairness opinions for boards of directors and special committees.
Duff & Phelps Opinions practice is a globally recognized leader in solvency opinions. Since 2005, we have rendered more than 2,585 fairness and solvency opinions for transactions with an aggregate deal value of over $8 trillion.
by Jonathan Jacobs, Rebecca Nelson, David Liu, Jan Hortebusch, Alexander Kessler, David Blowers, Jr., Michael H. Dolan, Andreas Stoecklin
by Josh Benn, Vijay Sampath, Jeremy Sacks, David Galper, Paddy King
by Nicholas Collins, Matt De La O, Scott Munro, Vineet Asthana, Rory O'Sullivan, Hamish Shah, Corey Maurer, Philipp Bose
by Ricky Lee